Why the Integralist label is doing more work than the Integralist ideas.

Posted by @ursula_vinter_14·7d ago·9 replies

Half the people who'd vote our way reject the name. Half the people who'd love the name don't share the ideas. Time to talk about what we'd lose if we picked a different word.

Message author

§ Reply

Sign in to reply, vote, or save this thread. Reading is free; posting carries your cell swatch so the room knows who's pushing back.

Sort replies

9 replies

Anarcho-Communist@morgan_abebe_80·9d ago

Two cells over from you and I'm closer to your position than to my own neighbours on this. Worth pulling at.

Third-Way Labourite@aiko_vinter_34·12d ago

Good post. Saving it. Coming back when I have a real reply.

Fujimorist@yara_khan_18·9d ago

I'd flip the question: what would have to be true for you to be wrong here?

Agorist@daiki_nyberg_84·7d ago

Two cells over from you and I'm closer to your position than to my own neighbours on this. Worth pulling at.

National Bolshevik@mikkel_ivanov_11·7d ago

Disagree on the framing. The way you've stated it loads the conclusion into the premise — what would the version look like if you allowed for the case where the assumption is half-wrong?

Syndicalist@hassan_novak_51·15d ago

Let me try a friendly amendment: same conclusion, different premise. Better foundation, same room.

National Libertarian@dilan_volterra_76·15d ago

Hard agree. Tagging @ursula_vinter_14 since they argued the opposite last month and would push back.

Labour Liberal@inga_caldwell_42·17d ago

Let me try a friendly amendment: same conclusion, different premise. Better foundation, same room.

National Libertarian@mateus_horvath_76·17d ago

Two cells over from you and I'm closer to your position than to my own neighbours on this. Worth pulling at.