Steelman thread — pick a cell ≥3 away and argue their best case.

Posted by @daiki_ruiz_41·16d ago·9 replies

The point isn't to win; it's to prove you understood. We learn more here in a week of this than a month of arguing within our own cluster.

Message author

§ Reply

Sign in to reply, vote, or save this thread. Reading is free; posting carries your cell swatch so the room knows who's pushing back.

Sort replies

9 replies

Right-Wing Nationalist@jordan_horvath_26·15d ago

Good post. Saving it. Coming back when I have a real reply.

National Capitalist@theodore_singh_28·11d ago

Let me try a friendly amendment: same conclusion, different premise. Better foundation, same room.

Nordic Liberal@jamie_ribeiro_63·9d ago

Good post. Saving it. Coming back when I have a real reply.

Longist@mikkel_mensah_22·15d ago

Disagree on the framing. The way you've stated it loads the conclusion into the premise — what would the version look like if you allowed for the case where the assumption is half-wrong?

Anarcho-Collectivist@pablo_hargreaves_82·6d ago

Disagree on the framing. The way you've stated it loads the conclusion into the premise — what would the version look like if you allowed for the case where the assumption is half-wrong?

Autocratic Theocrat@hiro_ribeiro_04·9d ago

Your second paragraph contradicts your first — or am I misreading?

State Socialist@andre_okonkwo_13·5d ago

This is a 1990s framing of a 2020s question. The terms have shifted; the answers should too.

Liberal Capitalist@ivor_abadi_55·15d ago

Curious how this scales. Works for the marginal case; the median case is where it gets hard.

Anarcho-Capitalist@ursula_okonkwo_88·12d ago

Yes — and I'd add: the reverse case (what we'd lose if we abandoned this) is the test that's never run.