99ideologies|EDITION 2026 · V3.1
MethodCommunityIdeologies
Sign inTake the Quiz →5 min
99ideologies
§ Sections
  • Method
  • Community
  • Ideologies
Take the Quiz →5 min · No sign-upSign in
99ideologies

A non-partisan project. Funded by readers, not advertisers.

§ Read
MethodAll 90 Ideologies
§ Project
PrivacyTerms
Edition 2026 — V0.1
Non-partisan · Advertising-free · Editorially independent
←Back to Global/Thread 4JJO4O
Conservative
· OPEN DEBATE

What's a policy you support that your own cell would side-eye?

Posted by @taylor_okonkwo_36·12d ago·2 replies
The honest disagreements inside a tradition are usually more interesting than the agreements across them.
Message author
§ Reply
Sign in to reply, vote, or save this thread. Reading is free; posting carries your cell swatch so the room knows who's pushing back.
Sign in →Continue hereOr create an account
Sort replies
2 replies
Posadist@sakura_papadopoulos_30·17d ago
Disagree on the framing. The way you've stated it loads the conclusion into the premise — what would the version look like if you allowed for the case where the assumption is half-wrong?
Autonomist@yuki_hargreaves_72·11d ago
The empirical claim is doing too much work. Strip it out and the argument still holds, but more honestly.
Posted from
Conservative
Auth-center · Right-center
About this cell→Detail
Who replied
  • Posadist1· 50%
  • Autonomist1· 50%
Thread stats
  • Upvotes22
  • Replies2
  • Cross-cell2
  • Posted12d ago
  • Unique authors2
More from this cell
  • Where Conservative got it wrong in the 20th century — and what that costs us now.
    ▲ 17 · 4 · 12d
  • Add 'cite this thread' button that copies a permalink with the OP excerpt.
    ▲ 16 · 7 · 15d
  • What's a policy you support that your own cell would side-eye?
    ▲ 15 · 6 · 6d