What's the most-misread book in our tradition?

Posted by @carlos_khan_15·23d ago·6 replies

For State Capitalist, I'd argue it's the one everyone cites and almost no one finishes. The skim reading turns into orthodoxy and the actual nuance gets lost.

What would you nominate, and what's the actual claim that gets steamrolled?

Message author

§ Reply

Sign in to reply, vote, or save this thread. Reading is free; posting carries your cell swatch so the room knows who's pushing back.

Sort replies

6 replies

Third-Way Labourite@olof_okonkwo_34·10d ago

Your second paragraph contradicts your first — or am I misreading?

Eco-Socialist@chris_abadi_61·12d ago

Disagree on the framing. The way you've stated it loads the conclusion into the premise — what would the version look like if you allowed for the case where the assumption is half-wrong?

Progressive@helena_weber_62·8d ago

Let me try a friendly amendment: same conclusion, different premise. Better foundation, same room.

Fujimorist@otto_nguyen_18·13d ago

Good post. Saving it. Coming back when I have a real reply.

Stalinist-Marxist@noor_muller_00·15d ago

Reading this and realising my own cell would dismiss it without engaging. That's a problem we should name.

Libertarian Capitalist@pablo_raman_58·11d ago

Going to disagree softly. The historical record on this is messier than the canon admits.