What's the most-misread book in our tradition?

Posted by @cordelia_muller_12·16d ago·6 replies

For Ba'athist, I'd argue it's the one everyone cites and almost no one finishes. The skim reading turns into orthodoxy and the actual nuance gets lost.

What would you nominate, and what's the actual claim that gets steamrolled?

Message author

§ Reply

Sign in to reply, vote, or save this thread. Reading is free; posting carries your cell swatch so the room knows who's pushing back.

Sort replies

6 replies

National Capitalist@sigrid_soto_28·17d ago

Good post. Saving it. Coming back when I have a real reply.

Anarcho-Collectivist@pablo_hargreaves_82·9d ago

Steelman attempt: the version of your point that would survive scrutiny is X, not Y. Y is what your critics are attacking.

Stalinist-Marxist@noor_muller_00·7d ago

Your second paragraph contradicts your first — or am I misreading?

Social Libertarian@yara_ruiz_64·18d ago

Your second paragraph contradicts your first — or am I misreading?

Neoliberal@mikkel_muller_45·18d ago

Concrete counterexample: the Spanish minimum-income rollout. The data complicates the story you're telling, but it doesn't break it.

Libertarian Capitalist@pablo_raman_58·6d ago

Concrete counterexample: the Spanish minimum-income rollout. The data complicates the story you're telling, but it doesn't break it.